Category Archives: editing basics

Oct 24 2017
business of editing, editing basics, tips & tricks

Managing tasks

My job as a self-employed editor means keeping track of dozens — sometimes hundreds — of discrete tasks for each project. And at any given time, I typically have three to five projects on my desk at the same time, sometimes up to ten in various stage of completion.
How do I keep track of it all?
The cornerstone of my system is a detailed checklist for each project. I wrangle those to-do lists with a program called Things, but the same principles apply no matter what program you use, whether it’s a dedicated to-do program or a word processor, or even if you make checklists on paper.
These project checklists contain every single little thing I have to do for each project. Everything.
I break tasks into groups, put them in the order they need to be completed, and assign a date to each one. That date may end up shifting a bit, but it gives me a starting point for looking at what needs to get done when.
Because I do a lot of similar projects for the same clients, I’ve created master checklist templates for each type of project from each client. These contain all the possible things I might need to do for that project.
When a new project comes in, I duplicate the relevant template, fill in the project information, and add/remove/adjust tasks as needed.
For example, here’s a task list for a proofreading project:
Prelims:
  • confirm receipt
  • add to master project sheet (this is a spreadsheet where I keep track of all of my projects: word count, ISBN, etc.)
  • schedule
  • check pagination
  • check RHs
  • check alignment
  • check TOC
  • check chapter titles in notes
  • check all chapters present, in order, and treated the same
  • check alphabetization of references
  • check alphabetization of glossary
  • check all notes present and in order
  • print note-checking sheets (I have a particular way of making sure all notes are accounted for; I’ll write about that another time)

Proof:

  • FM
  • chapter 1 (and so on, through to the last chapter)
  • BM
  • crossmarking (incorporate author changes)
  • check for BBs and stacks
  • final flip-through

Wrap up:

  • finalize stylesheet, if necessary
  • invoice
  • return
  • finalize master project sheet
Because my projects are usually book projects and I usually break those down by chapter, I’ve populated my templates with a large set of chapter numbers. I simply delete the ones I don’t need. This is a huge time saver, since I don’t have to type out chapter numbers every time I get a new project in.
(I do get a good chunk of popular fiction to work on, and those tend to have a ton of super-short chapters. For those, I create clusters of three or five chapters in one checklist item. I’m not that much of a micromanager.😊)
Trusting and following the checklist is the key to making sure tasks don’t fall through the cracks.
I’ll talk next time about how I manage the bigger picture.
Feb 22 2016
2 Comments
editing basics, for authors

What does editing mean?

You’ve worked on your book for months — maybe even years — and now it’s time to get it edited. But what exactly does editing mean?

Let’s compare that nebulous concept, editing, to landscaping. If your yard is in pretty good shape, you might want someone to simply come and cut the grass and deal with small problems as they come up: a patch of crabgrass, an overgrown shrub. Some yards need a bit more TLC to look good: edging, fertilizing, aeration, overseeding. You might need to take down a shrub or tree, or plant a new one. If you’re starting with a bare patch of dirt and a vague idea of what you want it to look like, you’ll need someone who can come up with a plan and then plant grass and trees, build retaining walls, install walkways and lighting, and the like.

The word editing, like the word landscaping, covers a range of services, from copyediting to developmental editing. Different editors use slightly different descriptions, or add more levels between these, but these are the basics most editors agree on:

  • Copyediting is the most basic form of editing: fixing errors in spelling, grammar, usage, and the like, and applying a consistent style (Gray or grey? Unspoken thoughts in quotes or italics? Section breaks marked with a blank line or an ornament? How are numbers treated?). The copyeditor should also be on the lookout for inconsistencies in the content; for example, your main character’s eyes were described as deep blue in the first few chapters, but later they are described as chocolate brown. In fiction especially, it should include pointing out problems in the timeline (event A happened on Thanksgiving, and event B was stated as being four days later but also a Saturday). Copyediting may or may not include basic fact checking (Is Nicholas Cage the correct spelling of the actor’s name? Can you drive from Indianapolis to New Orleans in eight hours?). Many copyeditors charge extra for this service, and some do not provide it at all. (I provide basic fact checking as part of my copyediting service.)
  • Line or content editing goes a bit deeper. A line editor does heavier editing at the sentence and paragraph level, beyond merely fixing grammar, to make the text flow better. She will point out (and perhaps fix, depending on your agreement) bigger-picture problems in story, characterization, and organization.
  • Developmental or structural editing involves working closely with the author to bring the author’s rough idea or draft manuscript into publishable form. This may involve organizing or reorganizing, suggesting creation of new content or deletion of existing content, and otherwise guiding the author at the bedrock level of content.

Most editors do not perform the entire range of editing services. A good developmental author may not be a good copyeditor, and vice versa. Authors should not expect a copyeditor to fix structural problems with the manuscript, nor should they expect that their manuscript will be publishable immediately after working with a developmental editor.

The most important thing is that the author and editor agree about what level of editing needs to be done and what they expect from each other.